![]() Instead, with the killing of Torygg, war sparked. ![]() Skyrim could have succeeded peacefuly, like Hammerfell did long ago. ![]() She states that Torygg, if asked by Ulfric, may have stood up against the Empire. Now, with dialoge from Sybille Stentor, We can start to see the Duel/Murder of High King Torygg was unnecisarry, and Ulfric was more into taking the throne than succeeding from the Empire. "I faced him fearlessly - my fate inescapable, yet my honor is unstained - can Ulfric say the same?" "When Ulfric Stormcloak, with savage Shout, sent me here, my sole regret was fair Elisif, left forlorn and weeping." Given what Torygg tells the player in Sovrnguard, he did have a chance to defend himself. ![]() The Stormcloaks say it was a duel, the Imperials say it was a murder. ![]() Well, I will say, with reason, why I side the way I do.įirst off, Ulfric and Torygg's fight. This is the one that caused so much fights it almost became a taboo in chat. (This is a post I made on a thread that I though was good enough to post as a discussion starter)Īh, the mighty question of Skyrim. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |